Black Spot = Crap
“No mindfucking ads. Just sustainable, accountable companies. Run by us”—from an Adbuster’s ad
Kitsilano-based Adbusters has gone to the dark side. What was a magazine focused on deconstructing advertising has become everything it once hated. What was once the house organ of a movement has become a focus-group for twenty-to-thirty-year old early adopters. Adbusters has become a brand, and like Crystal Pepsi or McDonald’s Pitas, it wants to extend it.
Adbusters noticed you kids like the Converse shoe, particularly the Chuck Taylor in all its black and red goodness. You kids may or may not know that Converse is owned by Nike and as everyone knows there is no bigger example of badness than Nike. Not even paedophiles.
So Adbusters has decided to make shoes. It has decided to market shoes. It has decided to advertise shoes. It has decided to use the cachet of the brand of Adbusters to sell a product.
This is obviously a joke. It is the kind of thing that gets the media all aflutter, so then the master mischief-makers can point and laugh and say, ‘Ha! Made you believe that everyone is eventually a sell out!’ After a decade and a half, Adbusters has eventually sold out.
The shoe is made in Portugal by a respectable company that hardly ever sells its employees for dog food. Adbusters touts the reasonableness of their factory choice in their marketing material. ‘The work day is from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m,’ says Black Spot‘s website, advertising the ten-hour day as a feature of their shoe. Also, the workers who make the shoe make 420 and 700 Euros per month ($600 – $1000) for a senior worker. A recent ad in the Georgia Straight advertised an entry-level editor position at Adbusters at $2500 a month.
But Adbusters knows that its market won’t respond to regular brand advertising. You are not buying a foreign-labour-made knock-off shoe, you are buying a share of an ‘anti-corporation.’ You see, each shoe gives you a half-share in the Black Spot Shoe anti-corporation. What is the difference between a corporation and an anti-corporation? In a corporation, as a shareholder you are entitled to vote for the board of directors, voice your opinion at annual general meetings, receive accurate and audited quarterly financial reports and can pool your shares with other like-minded people to transform corporate policies. In an anti-corporation, you get to take part in a web forum while CEO and Adbusters editor Kalle Lasn does whatever he pleases.
The Black Spot Shoe Company is merely a division of the non-profit Adbusters media foundation, Kalle Lasn, prop. (Assisting Mr. Lasn on Adbuster’s three-member board is his photographer pal and his lawyer.) It is answerable to no one and, as a non-profit, has no requirement to pay income tax like, say, a foreign shoe company.
‘Imagine a chain of restaurants serving only locally-sourced food. Or an artist-controlled radio network. Or a consumer co-op for organic clothing.’—from the same Adbusters ad.
Adbusters doesn’t want to inspire business owners to create locally owned, locally controlled companies. It wants to replace well-established brand chains with their hipper brand chain. If you think it’s a joke, go back to the third paragraph. I’s not a joke.
Nobody is saying that the employees of Adbusters can’t make a living. If Kalle wanted to say, ‘I want to start a company that uses my ideals of Adbusters and demonstrates how it works in the real world,’ well, Godspeed. Instead, he is using thousands of his cultural jamming automatons as an ATM.
Black Spot is creepy. Buy the shoe and sell your soul.

Sean Orr
How long have people been calling Adbusters ‘sell outs?’ Since they went from news print to glossy? Since they started using graphic design? Since they started selling them in 7-eleven? Chapters? Since Naomi Klein dissed them for ‘selling’ the Corporate America Flag?
People who are seen as anti-capitalist rarely identify themselves as such, as it is more of a media construct. They never claim to be against capitalism, but rather seek to contain economic growth at the expense of the physical and mental environment.
They declare the system flawed indeed, but promote systems for accountability such as the Genuine Progress Indicator, the Tobin Tax, and the end of corporate personhood. This is not to say that buying a pair of no sweat Blackspot sneakers is not a consumptive act, it is. However, in order to work within the confines of the system, it is necessary to choose those things that do the least harm. Yes, buying Blackspot is still buying, but is that so bad given the options? Is it not better to steer the bull away from you rather than risk getting trampled? The medium is the message, and you’re shooting the messanger.
Dissing Blackspot is neither new nor original. It is an easy position for the old left to adopt; a “you can’t have our revolution” holier than thou attitude. This isn’t Arcade Fire or white belts dude, this is sweatshop labour, this is an end to self righteous neo-hippies whining about the Gap and Starbucks. Alterntively, its an attempt for a small, hipster rag to gain credibility with its cynical, jaded audience. What are you, Vice?
So, a black canvas shoe with a white toe automatically equals Chuck Taylors, right? How did you come up with that? Oh yeah, because of branding. Your well-honed brand recognition skills immediately kick into action. Nevertheless, you’re right. However, who were the ones to kidnap Chucks? Not Blackspot, but Nike. They are the ones who dictate what is supposedly cool.
You should be able to get Blackspots in every Walmart right next to Nike’s new ‘John Lennon Peace Chucks’. By targeting Blackspot you have fallen into the trap that you claim to be avoiding. That is, by defining what is cool and what is not cool, what is selling out and what is not, you are mirroring modern marketing as if by script. Oliver James writes that “advanced capitalism maintains itself by fostering spurious individualism, pressuring us to define ourselves through our purchases, with ever more precisely marketed products that create a fetishistic concern to have ‘this’ rather than ‘that’, even when there is no significant practical or aesthetic difference”. - Jan 18, 12:12 AM
fadbuster
Check out my new shoes, dude. They’re Blackspots, made by Adbusters. My friend Sean has a pair, too. We are going to wear them when we topple the consumerist power structures and forge a sustainable, detoxified memosphere for the 21st century. It is going to be really great! We’re talking about, like, uh… a quantum paradigm shift here, dude. Holy shit! We’re going to totally fuck up corporate hegemony by hacking into the public consciousness and reversing learned responses to branding stereotypes. We be jammin’ man… Culture jammin’, that is… I’m telling you, we got some really sweet shit going on here. For example, last night I made a t-shirt that has a picture of a clown with red hair, and underneath it says “Ronald McDUHnald”! It’s totally going to fuck with peoples’ minds when they see it. You know, I have a poster of Kalle Lasn on my ceiling. I like to look at it when I masturbate and think about how much I hate this swirling vortex of consumptive toxicity. I really want to improve my eco literacy so I can learn to protect my cultural capital. Know what I mean? I’m an urban guerilla, man, and I’m making the world a much better place, believe me. I can’t wait until the rest of the world wakes the fuck up. We are the future! - Jan 18, 01:28 AM
Sean Orr
yeah, I get it. I read Vice too. Doing stuff is lame. Fucking hippies. - Jan 21, 01:34 AM
duke
yeah, Sean orr is pretty much a keen fag alraedy. - Jan 24, 11:48 AM
Sean Orr
Is that you Bill O’Reilly? How’s Ann Coulter? - Jan 28, 11:21 AM
big dean
I think it’s hilarious how these Adbusters teenie-boppers try to pass themselves off as messiahs/ martyrs. Boring bullshit.
At first, I thought that the hand drawn toe tip “for kicking corporate ass” was a joke by Only, but then I went to the Adbusters web site and found that it was real. Holy shit.
Sean Orr will probably call me a Vice-lovin’ Bill O’Reily freak for drawing his manifesto to ridicule, but whatever. He’s an idiot. - Feb 2, 09:34 PM
Sean Orr
No Dean, i won’t call you that. You actually have some good points, it’s the jaded, cynical, hipster irony of the previous posts that are just attacking me and not engaging in any sort of debate which is reminiscent of Vice and Fox News.
I certainly don’t think that buying these shoes is going to change the world, or that ‘jamming’ billboards is either. But i do think that there is merit in criticising your surroundings and the dominant institutions of our time and not acquiescing to the corporate agenda. Criticising those who criticise is a little more cowardly.
You must remember the people who Adbusters is targeting; bored, overstimulated, depressed, american teenagers who browse magazine racks saturated with maxim soft core, who’s hot/who’s not, steroid jocks, and how to lose weight in thirty days tabloid tripe.
They aren’t targeting you or me. We should know better.
Oh and by the way, how exactly did you draw my manifesto into ridicule? - Feb 4, 03:15 PM
gay duke
LEAVE SEAN ORR ALONE!!! - Feb 7, 05:54 PM