rlrr: The McCain campaign apparently has a new theme this week: attacking Obama for wanting to “spread the wealth.” But it is not clear what that really means. Many Republicans have bitterly opposed the federal income tax since the 16th amendment was passed in 1913. Is McCain going to repeal the federal income tax? If so, how does he plan to finance the government? Or does he mean that the difference between the top rate of 39.6% under Bill Clinton and the top rate of 36% under George Bush is the difference between communism and capitalism? The purpose of the progressive federal income tax is to spread the wealth. That Democrats have supported a progressive income tax for decades is hardly news. Does McCain want to keep the tax but make it a flat tax (a la Steve Forbes)? No word on this. It seems this is just another desperate attempt to attack Obama rather than being a serious policy proposal for tax reform and it comes awfully late in the game. If McCain wanted to run on a platform of a flat tax, he certainly has had the opportunity, but until now he didn’t bring up the subject.
What put this all into Cloud Cuckoo Land is that no state ‘spreads the wealth’ more than Alaska. Thanks to the Alaska Permanent Fund, every resident of Alaska gets a cut of the royalties on resources. Palin doubled the payment to residents this year.
This is possible because, in Alaska, the state owns the mineral rights. In every other US state, the land owner owns everything under the surface.
This is what the interminable softwood lumber fights between the US and Canada are about. In Canada, like Alaska, resource rights are held by the Crown yet the US Government has fought a twenty-year legal battle against Canada for ‘subsidising’ the price of lumber. It argues that resources should be owned privately.
Comrade Palin, and her people, obviously believe in the communal ownership of land. Republicans of the world, unite!